In a story out of Hawaii we have yet another example of someone taking the self important role of defending the Constitution against anything that offends his own religious views. The problem is that he- and those who take his incoherent babbling seriously-have either never read the US Constitution or it is simply written on a grade level beyond their level of comprehension. Even so, the wording of the First Amendment is pretty straightforward and unambiguous.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The leader of the group behind the lawsuit, a group of which he appears to be the only visible member, claims that they are opposed to “violations of the Constitution.” Well it appears that the only ones seeking “prohibit the free exercise” of religion is his group while demanding the government establish the quasi religion of secularism as the law of the land.